I have noticed that opinions on using AI in the legal profession are completely divided. During internships, some lawyers have encouraged me to learn AI tools because they believe these tools will become an essential part of legal practice. However, I have also met professionals who strongly discourage students from using AI. They believe it weakens legal reasoning, affects research skills, and makes students overly dependent on technology.
As a law student, I want to build strong legal fundamentals while also keeping up with new technology. This has left me confused about where AI should fit into my learning process. Which skills and tasks should law students use AI for, and which areas should we deliberately learn without relying on AI to develop strong legal knowledge and professional competence?
Hi,
When it comes to AI, I believe everyone should learn how to use it effectively while also understanding its limitations. Knowing both its strengths and its drawbacks helps us assess the reliability of the content it generates. AI is a powerful tool when used intelligently and can save considerable time on routine tasks. However, when dealing with specific laws, Acts, Rules, Regulations, or Circulars, one should always rely on official websites and authoritative sources. It is essential to independently verify any information obtained through AI, as hallucinations and inaccuracies remain a known limitation. The key is to use AI as an aid, not as a substitute for professional judgment or primary legal sources.
